On Thu, 27 Mar 2025 11:30:11 GMT, Alan Bateman <al...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> I'm breaking this change out as a separate improvement, since it will not be 
>> generally possible to adjust these limits on the j.u.c primitives since they 
>> might already use a backing `long` to pack in information which needs to be 
>> updated atomically (would require 128-bit atomics to widen them, and it 
>> still infeasible to change return types of pre-existing APIs).
>
> We'll need to double check serialization compatibility as the "sync" field is 
> in the serial form.

@AlanBateman I was able to serialize a RRWL created before this patch and 
deserialize it after this patch.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24261#issuecomment-2761756050

Reply via email to