On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 17:38:00 GMT, Viktor Klang <vkl...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Doug Lea has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional 
>> commit since the last revision:
>> 
>>   Address feedback
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/concurrent/ForkJoinPool.java line 3526:
> 
>> 3524:         if (((ds = delayScheduler) == null &&
>> 3525:              (ds = startDelayScheduler()) == null) ||
>> 3526:             task == null || (runState & SHUTDOWN) != 0L)
> 
> Might not make sense to start the delay scheduler if the task is null.

There's no longer need or value of that null check (there was in some trial 
version), so removed.

> src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/concurrent/ForkJoinPool.java line 3557:
> 
>> 3555:         return scheduleDelayedTask(
>> 3556:             new ScheduledForkJoinTask<Void>(
>> 3557:                 unit.toNanos(delay), 0L, false, command, null, this));
> 
> Suggestion:
> 
>                 unit.toNanos(delay), 0L, false, command, null, this)); // 
> Implicit null-check of unit

done

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23702#discussion_r1966510207
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23702#discussion_r1966509890

Reply via email to