On Thu, 20 Feb 2025 22:17:36 GMT, Brian Burkhalter <b...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> That would be okay too, just need to avoid circular initialization.
>
> So changed in a3b7977.

Thanks, that is better replace for this. In time it may be a good candidate to 
be a stable value.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22821#discussion_r1965014862

Reply via email to