On Thu, 30 Jan 2025 00:37:16 GMT, Shaojin Wen <s...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> The type of the Unsafe base offset constant is int, which may cause overflow >> when adding int offsets, such as 8343925 (PR #22012). 8343984 (PR #22027) >> fixes most of the offset overflows in JDK, but ArraysSupport and CRC32C are >> still unfixed. >> >> @liach proposed the idea of changing the Unsafe base offset to long, which >> is a complete solution to the Unsafe offset overflow. After discussing with >> @liach, I submitted this PR to implement @liach's idea. > > Shaojin Wen has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional > commit since the last revision: > > copyright I'm curious why `arrayOopDesc::base_offset_in_bytes` was not included in this change - does it not face the same overflow problem? ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22095#issuecomment-2648702248
