On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 22:19:22 GMT, Adam Sotona <asot...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> Despite the 265 modified files is this PR trying to be minimalistic. > Repackaging of the library would be far more complex and would affect > significantly more files, including the library itself. I would recommend to > invest that effort into the tests conversion into Class-File API instead. I'm not suggesting any re-packaging or pre-packaging, just saying that you can revert the changes that we have in the jdk repo so it goes back to .org.objectweb.asm. If we aren't doing that then okay but we still need to change all the tests that use it to remove "@modules java.base/jdk.internal.org.objectweb.asm". ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22946#issuecomment-2576882323
