On Thu, 21 Nov 2024 06:50:48 GMT, Jaikiran Pai <j...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> Hello Daniel, the changes look good to me. However, these changes appear to > include both JEP 486 related updates as well as the JEP 491 (the reverting of > ReentrantLock usage in favour of synchronized). Doing this clean up together > I think is fine. However, I think we should update the issue title to also > include JEP 491 in addition to JEP 486. Oh right. I should have mentioned that in the summary. This is now done, I modified the JBS and PR titles as suggested too. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22281#issuecomment-2490703222
