On Wed, 9 Oct 2024 11:49:47 GMT, Markus KARG <d...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> This Pull Requests proposes an implementation for 
>> [JDK-8341566](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8341566): Adding the new 
>> method `public static Reader Reader.of(CharSequence)` will return an 
>> anonymous, non-synchronized implementation of a `Reader` for each kind of 
>> `CharSequence` implementation. It is optimized for `String`, 
>> `StringBuilder`, `StringBuffer` and `CharBuffer`.
>> 
>> In addition, this Pull Request proposes to replace the implementation of 
>> `StringReader` to become a simple synchronized wrapper around 
>> `Reader.of(CharSequence)` for the case of `String` sources. To ensure 
>> correctness, this PR...
>> * ...simply moved the **original code** of `StringBuilder` to become the 
>> de-facto implementation of `Reader.of()`, then stripped synchronized from it 
>> on the left hand, but kept just a synchronized wrapper on the right hand. 
>> Then added a `switch` for optimizations within the original code, at the 
>> exact location where previously just an optimization for `String` lived in.
>> * ...added tests for all methods (`Of.java`), and applied that test upon the 
>> modified `StringBuilder`.
>> 
>> Wherever new JavaDocs were added, existing phrases from other code locations 
>> have been copied and adapted, to best match the same wording.
>
> Markus KARG has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional 
> commits since the last revision:
> 
>  - assertThrows instead of expectedExceptions
>  - ordered jtreg tags according recommendation in 
> https://openjdk.org/jtreg/tag-spec.html#ORDER

> I have looked at the CSR and revised the wording for you, mostly conveying 
> information CSR review wants to see.
> @mkarg Can you take a look at this revised version of CSR?

Thank you, Chen. I have no experience with CSR, so I do trust in yours. Having 
said that, I now have upgraded the status from "Draft" to "Finalized". Ist that 
enough to trigger the review process, or do I have to set an assignee / 
manually trigger somebody?

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21371#issuecomment-2402946651

Reply via email to