On Sun, 6 Oct 2024 17:44:53 GMT, Markus KARG <d...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> This Pull Requests proposes an implementation for 
>> [JDK-8341566](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8341566): Adding the new 
>> method `public static Reader Reader.of(CharSequence)` will return an 
>> anonymous, non-synchronized implementation of a `Reader` for each kind of 
>> `CharSequence` implementation. It is optimized for `String`, 
>> `StringBuilder`, `StringBuffer` and `CharBuffer`.
>> 
>> In addition, this Pull Request proposes to replace the implementation of 
>> `StringReader` to become a simple synchronized wrapper around 
>> `Reader.of(CharSequence)` for the case of `String` sources. To ensure 
>> correctness, this PR...
>> * ...simply moved the **original code** of `StringBuilder` to become the 
>> de-facto implementation of `Reader.of()`, then stripped synchronized from it 
>> on the left hand, but kept just a synchronized wrapper on the right hand. 
>> Then added a `switch` for optimizations within the original code, at the 
>> exact location where previously just an optimization for `String` lived in.
>> * ...added tests for all methods (`Of.java`), and applied that test upon the 
>> modified `StringBuilder`.
>> 
>> Wherever new JavaDocs were added, existing phrases from other code locations 
>> have been copied and adapted, to best match the same wording.
>
> Markus KARG has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional 
> commit since the last revision:
> 
>   fixup! Reader.of(String)
>   
>   Dropping non-public JavaDocs

src/java.base/share/classes/java/io/Reader.java line 231:

> 229:             public boolean ready() throws IOException {
> 230:                 ensureOpen();
> 231:                 return true;

I guess it’s not wrong, but can this be false when end of source is reached? 
Related to this you already described it is not synchronized but should we also 
describe it does not support changes to the length during “iteration” (could be 
in the same thread).

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21371#discussion_r1789190894

Reply via email to