On Thu, 19 Sep 2024 21:43:01 GMT, Sandhya Viswanathan
<[email protected]> wrote:
>> Currently the rearrange and selectFrom APIs check shuffle indices and throw
>> IndexOutOfBoundsException if there is any exceptional source index in the
>> shuffle. This causes the generated code to be less optimal. This PR modifies
>> the rearrange/selectFrom Vector API methods to perform wrapIndexes instead
>> of checkIndexes and performs optimizations to generate efficient code.
>>
>> Summary of changes is as follows:
>> 1) The rearrange/selectFrom methods do wrapIndexes instead of checkIndexes.
>> 2) Intrinsic for wrapIndexes and selectFrom to generate efficient code
>>
>> For the following source:
>>
>>
>> public void test() {
>> var index = ByteVector.fromArray(bspecies128, shuffles[1], 0);
>> for (int j = 0; j < bspecies128.loopBound(size); j +=
>> bspecies128.length()) {
>> var inpvect = ByteVector.fromArray(bspecies128, byteinp, j);
>> index.selectFrom(inpvect).intoArray(byteres, j);
>> }
>> }
>>
>>
>> The code generated for inner main now looks as follows:
>> ;; B24: # out( B24 B25 ) <- in( B23 B24 ) Loop( B24-B24 inner main of
>> N173 strip mined) Freq: 4160.96
>> 0x00007f40d02274d0: movslq %ebx,%r13
>> 0x00007f40d02274d3: vmovdqu 0x10(%rsi,%r13,1),%xmm1
>> 0x00007f40d02274da: vpshufb %xmm2,%xmm1,%xmm1
>> 0x00007f40d02274df: vmovdqu %xmm1,0x10(%rax,%r13,1)
>> 0x00007f40d02274e6: vmovdqu 0x20(%rsi,%r13,1),%xmm1
>> 0x00007f40d02274ed: vpshufb %xmm2,%xmm1,%xmm1
>> 0x00007f40d02274f2: vmovdqu %xmm1,0x20(%rax,%r13,1)
>> 0x00007f40d02274f9: vmovdqu 0x30(%rsi,%r13,1),%xmm1
>> 0x00007f40d0227500: vpshufb %xmm2,%xmm1,%xmm1
>> 0x00007f40d0227505: vmovdqu %xmm1,0x30(%rax,%r13,1)
>> 0x00007f40d022750c: vmovdqu 0x40(%rsi,%r13,1),%xmm1
>> 0x00007f40d0227513: vpshufb %xmm2,%xmm1,%xmm1
>> 0x00007f40d0227518: vmovdqu %xmm1,0x40(%rax,%r13,1)
>> 0x00007f40d022751f: add $0x40,%ebx
>> 0x00007f40d0227522: cmp %r8d,%ebx
>> 0x00007f40d0227525: jl 0x00007f40d02274d0
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Sandhya
>
> Sandhya Viswanathan has updated the pull request incrementally with one
> additional commit since the last revision:
>
> Implement review comments
Thanks @sviswa7 , LGTM
-------------
Marked as reviewed by jbhateja (Reviewer).
PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/20634#pullrequestreview-2318802240
