On Thu, 30 May 2024 13:19:57 GMT, Scott Gibbons <sgibb...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Re-write the IndexOf code without the use of the pcmpestri instruction, only 
>> using AVX2 instructions.  This change accelerates String.IndexOf on average 
>> 1.3x for AVX2.  The benchmark numbers:
>> 
>> 
>> Benchmark                                                   Score            
>> Latest          
>> StringIndexOf.advancedWithMediumSub   343.573                317.934         
>> 0.925375393x
>> StringIndexOf.advancedWithShortSub1    1039.081              1053.96         
>> 1.014319384x
>> StringIndexOf.advancedWithShortSub2        55.828            110.541         
>> 1.980027943x
>> StringIndexOf.constantPattern                        9.361           11.906  
>>         1.271872663x
>> StringIndexOf.searchCharLongSuccess          4.216           4.218           
>> 1.000474383x
>> StringIndexOf.searchCharMediumSuccess        3.133           3.216           
>> 1.02649218x
>> StringIndexOf.searchCharShortSuccess 3.76                    3.761           
>> 1.000265957x
>> StringIndexOf.success                                        9.186           
>> 9.713           1.057369911x
>> StringIndexOf.successBig                           14.341            46.343  
>>         3.231504079x
>> StringIndexOfChar.latin1_AVX2_String   6220.918              12154.52        
>>         1.953814533x
>> StringIndexOfChar.latin1_AVX2_char     5503.556              5540.044        
>>         1.006629895x
>> StringIndexOfChar.latin1_SSE4_String   6978.854              6818.689        
>>         0.977049957x
>> StringIndexOfChar.latin1_SSE4_char     5657.499              5474.624        
>>         0.967675646x
>> StringIndexOfChar.latin1_Short_String          7132.541              
>> 6863.359                0.962260014x
>> StringIndexOfChar.latin1_Short_char  16013.389             16162.437         
>> 1.009307711x
>> StringIndexOfChar.latin1_mixed_String          7386.123            14771.622 
>>         1.999915517x
>> StringIndexOfChar.latin1_mixed_char    9901.671              9782.245        
>>         0.987938803
>
> Scott Gibbons has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional 
> commits since the last revision:
> 
>  - Stupid EOL at end
>  - Add @test block; fix test indentation

test/jdk/java/lang/String/IndexOf.java line 25:

> 23: 
> 24: /*
> 25:  * @test

You should add the `@bug 8320448` for all runs.

test/jdk/java/lang/String/IndexOf.java line 27:

> 25:  * @test
> 26:  * @summary test String indexOf() intrinsic
> 27:  * @run main/othervm IndexOf

Suggestion:

 * @run main IndexOf

You do not need a new VM if you have no arguments ;)

test/jdk/java/lang/StringBuffer/ECoreIndexOf.java line 25:

> 23: 
> 24: /* @test
> 25:  * @bug 4162796 4162796

You need to fix the bug numbers.

test/jdk/java/lang/StringBuffer/ECoreIndexOf.java line 27:

> 25:  * @bug 4162796 4162796
> 26:  * @summary Test indexOf and lastIndexOf
> 27:  * @run main/othervm -Xbatch -XX:-TieredCompilation 
> -XX:CompileCommand=dontinline,ECoreIndexOf.indexOfKernel ECoreIndexOf

I would also add a line without `-XX:-TieredCompilation`, then C1 can be tested 
with this too

test/jdk/java/lang/StringBuffer/ECoreIndexOf.java line 32:

> 30: 
> 31: /* @test
> 32:  * @bug 4162796 4162796

Here too

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16753#discussion_r1620760730
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16753#discussion_r1620756896
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16753#discussion_r1620753321
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16753#discussion_r1620754948
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16753#discussion_r1620753577

Reply via email to