On Tue, 19 Mar 2024 12:16:29 GMT, Viktor Klang <vkl...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> This is a draft PR with a potential solution to 8328366 without regressing > 8327501. > > @DougLea To avoid regressions in the future, where would regression tests for > this ideally be located? FWIW, I've tested this with the quarkus reproducer and a reproducer for the class load leak. They seem both to work with this patch. Please be sure to mention the bug for the ThreadLocal follow-up. Thanks! ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/18374#issuecomment-2037767866
