Can I please get a review of this change which proposes to implement the enhancement request noted in https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8317634?
The change in this commit introduces a new `exclude-modules` argument to the `dedup-legal-notices` jlink plugin. This optional argument takes a comma separated values of module names. These module names are then excluded from the de-duplication of license notice files during image generation. Two new test methods have been added to the existing `LegalFilePluginTest` jtreg test case to verify this implementation. Existing tests in `test/jdk/tools/jlink` continue to pass. tier testing is currently in progress. ------------- Commit messages: - introduce an argument for --dedup-legal-notices option of jlink to optionally exclude certain modules' license files from de-duplication Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16066/files Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=16066&range=00 Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8317634 Stats: 168 lines in 2 files changed: 161 ins; 0 del; 7 mod Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16066.diff Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/16066/head:pull/16066 PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16066
