> On Windows, the basic Java Integer types are defined as long and __int64 > respectively. In particular, the former is rather problematic since it breaks > compilation as the Visual C++ becomes stricter and more compliant with every > release, which means the way Windows code treats long as a typedef for int is > no longer correct, especially with -permissive- enabled. Instead of changing > every piece of broken code to match the jint = long typedef, which is far too > time consuming, we can instead change jint to an int (which is still the same > 32 bit number type as long), as there are far fewer problems caused by this > definition. It's better to get this over and done with sooner than later when > a future version of Visual C++ finally starts to break on existing code
Julian Waters has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional commits since the last revision: - Revert wrong Copyright - Copyright ------------- Changes: - all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14125/files - new: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14125/files/80b6f787..16b5a914 Webrevs: - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=14125&range=10 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=14125&range=09-10 Stats: 7 lines in 7 files changed: 0 ins; 0 del; 7 mod Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14125.diff Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/14125/head:pull/14125 PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14125
