On Thu, 22 Jun 2023 14:40:23 GMT, Julian Waters <jwat...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> On Windows, the basic Java Integer types are defined as long and __int64 
>> respectively. In particular, the former is rather problematic since it 
>> breaks compilation as the Visual C++ becomes stricter and more compliant 
>> with every release, which means the way Windows code treats long as a 
>> typedef for int is no longer correct, especially with -permissive- enabled. 
>> Instead of changing every piece of broken code to match the jint = long 
>> typedef, which is far too time consuming, we can instead change jint to an 
>> int (which is still the same 32 bit number type as long), as there are far 
>> fewer problems caused by this definition. It's better to get this over and 
>> done with sooner than later when a future version of Visual C++ finally 
>> starts to break on existing code
>
> Julian Waters has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional 
> commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Revert "GetDIBits should take an LPVOID"
>   
>   This reverts commit 7dbe5dea84b1afb2235b66da581bcd3c1da4d6ac.

Will do, thanks Daniel
@prrace @dholmes-ora Are both of you happy with the changes?

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14125#issuecomment-1602811926

Reply via email to