On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 00:13:24 GMT, Chen Liang <li...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Correct misstatement that the Class object for a primitive type can only be
>> be access via fields like java.lang.Integer.TYPE.
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/Class.java line 818:
>
>> 816: * they represent, namely {@code boolean}, {@code byte},
>> 817: * {@code char}, {@code short}, {@code int},
>> 818: * {@code long}, {@code float}, and {@code double}.
>
> Should we add `{@code void}` to the list here, as this is one of the
> primitive type names?
Hmm. I'll consider that. The javadoc in java.lang.Class is inconsistent in the
formatting of "void" as a type name, some instances are in code markup while
others are not.
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14574#discussion_r1236032594
