On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 00:00:54 GMT, Joe Darcy <da...@openjdk.org> wrote:

> Correct misstatement that the Class object for a primitive type can only be 
> be access via fields like java.lang.Integer.TYPE.

src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/Class.java line 818:

> 816:      * they represent, namely {@code boolean}, {@code byte},
> 817:      * {@code char}, {@code short}, {@code int},
> 818:      * {@code long}, {@code float}, and {@code double}.

Should we add `{@code void}` to the list here, as this is one of the primitive 
type names?

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14574#discussion_r1236023720

Reply via email to