On Sun, 14 May 2023 06:37:05 GMT, Alan Bateman <al...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>>> > I'm just wondering where a developer might go to get a definitive list, >>> > i.e. aside from this API note, how would they know that "-trad" or >>> > "-traditional" can be used to configure the ordering. >>> > Locale.forLanguageTag supports more than BCP 47 language tag strings so >>> > is this considered a private use language tag. >>> >>> I think those should go into Oracle JDK's `Supported Locales` document. >>> Created a task to include them (https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8308018) >> >> `-u-co` is defined >> [here](https://www.unicode.org/reports/tr35/#UnicodeCollationIdentifier) >> (UTS#35) and the keys are in the datafile [here (link to `main` >> branch!)](https://github.com/unicode-org/cldr/blob/main/common/bcp47/collation.xml) >> - note the `since=` attribute, these are very stable. >> >> @AlanBateman >>> Locale.forLanguageTag supports more than BCP 47 language tag strings >> >> It should still be all valid BCP47 including extensions and private use >> (such as x-lvalue). >> >>> so is this considered a private use language tag >> >> Not private use at all. The `-u-` subtag is registered, and the links above >> are from the registrar, see >> - https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/bcp47 >> - https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6067 > >> > so is this considered a private use language tag >> >> Not private use at all. The `-u-` subtag is registered, and the links above >> are from the registrar, see >> >> * https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/bcp47 >> * https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6067 > > Good, I don't think I have any other questions on this now. Thanks, @AlanBateman for the review. @srl295 thanks. I found CLDR's collation documents are a bit outdated. Filed an issue here: https://unicode-org.atlassian.net/jira/software/c/projects/CLDR/issues/CLDR-16638 ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13917#issuecomment-1548178251
