On Wed, 19 Apr 2023 04:06:00 GMT, Vicente Romero <vrom...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Jan Lahoda has updated the pull request incrementally with six additional
>> commits since the last revision:
>>
>> - Fixing infinite loop where a binding pattern is replaced with a binding
>> pattern for the same type.
>> - Reflecting review comments.
>> - Fixing exhaustiveness for unsealed supertype pattern.
>> - No need to enable features after error reported.
>> - SwitchBootstraps.typeSwitch should not initialize enum classes.
>> - A prototype of avoiding enum initialization.
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/runtime/SwitchBootstraps.java line 170:
>
>> 168: } else if (label instanceof EnumDesc<?> enumDesc) {
>> 169: if (target.getClass().isEnum() &&
>> 170: ((Enum<?>)
>> target).describeConstable().stream().anyMatch(d -> d.equals(enumDesc))) {
>
> probably a matter of style but isn't it a bit too much to use streams here?
> there will be always only one element right?
Technically, one element, but the type is optional, so formally could be no
elements. I could use `.get()`, but that feels a bit ugly and against optional?
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13074#discussion_r1172599496
