On Tue, 18 Apr 2023 09:13:01 GMT, Jan Lahoda <jlah...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> This is the first draft of a patch for JEP 440 and JEP 441. Changes included:
>>
>> - the pattern matching for switch and record patterns features are made
>> final, together with updates to tests.
>> - parenthesized patterns are removed.
>> - qualified enum constants are supported for case labels.
>>
>> This change herein also includes removal record patterns in for each loop,
>> which may be split into a separate PR in the future.
>
> Jan Lahoda has updated the pull request incrementally with six additional
> commits since the last revision:
>
> - Fixing infinite loop where a binding pattern is replaced with a binding
> pattern for the same type.
> - Reflecting review comments.
> - Fixing exhaustiveness for unsealed supertype pattern.
> - No need to enable features after error reported.
> - SwitchBootstraps.typeSwitch should not initialize enum classes.
> - A prototype of avoiding enum initialization.
src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/runtime/SwitchBootstraps.java line 94:
> 92: * <li>the element is of type {@code String} or {@code Integer} and
> 93: * equals to the target.</li>
> 94: * <li>the element is of type {@code EnumDesc}, that describes a
> constant that is
I think that at ~line 76, up in this same javadoc you need to add a reference
to EnumDesc in the general description. Where it says:
The static arguments are an array of case labels which must be non-null and of
type
{@code String} or {@code Integer} or {@code Class}.
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13074#discussion_r1170531849
