On Wed, 22 Mar 2023 23:23:38 GMT, Chen Liang <li...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Jim Laskey has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional
>> commits since the last revision:
>>
>> - Tidy javadoc
>> - Rename StringTemplate classes
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/StringTemplate.java line 679:
>
>> 677: @PreviewFeature(feature=PreviewFeature.Feature.STRING_TEMPLATES)
>> 678: @FunctionalInterface
>> 679: public interface StringProcessor extends SimpleProcessor<String> {
>
> Just curious, what's the rationale of a `SimpleProcessor` or
> `StringProcessor` as opposed to:
>
> static <T> TemplateProcessor<T, RuntimeException>
> simple(Function<StringTemplate, T> function) {...}
> static TemplateProcessor<String, RuntimeException>
> string(Function<StringTemplate, String> function) {...}
>
> which avoids the requirement of specifying the type of the template processor
> local variable; users can use `var` instead.
Worth considering. Thank you.
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/10889#discussion_r1146091987
