On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 11:21:36 GMT, Lance Andersen <lan...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> The message is already validated using `expectedExceptionsMessageRegExp` in >> the `@Test` annotation. >> >> Would you prefer if I use expectThrows instead, or perhaps inline the >> `BAD_ENTRY_NAME_OR_COMMENT` constant as a literal? > > Sorry if this was not clear, we have gone away from using the annotation > element `exepectedExceptions` for new and updated tests and have tried to > standardize on `assertThrows` and `expectThrows` instead which is the basis > for my suggestion. > > > Thank you for your other updates. I will go through them later today No worries, this makes sense. Updated to expectThrows with assertEquals. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/12290
