On Wed, 1 Feb 2023 13:18:31 GMT, Per Minborg <pminb...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> `ZoneOffset` instances are cached by the `ZoneOffset` class itself for 
>> values in the range [-18h, 18h] for each second that is on an even quarter 
>> of an hour (i.e. at most 2*18*4+1 = 145 values). 
>> 
>> Instead of using a `ConcurrentHashMap` for caching instanced, we could 
>> instead use an `AtomicReferenceArray` with direct slot value access for said 
>> even seconds. This will improve performance and reduce the number of object 
>> even though the backing array will go from an initial 32 in the CHM to an 
>> initial/final 145 in the ARA. The CHM will contain much more objects and 
>> array slots for typical numbers of entries in the cache and will compute 
>> hash/bucket/collision on the hot code path for each cache access.
>
> Per Minborg has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional 
> commits since the last revision:
> 
>  - Simplify benchmark
>  - Add benchmark

test/jdk/java/time/tck/java/time/zone/TCKFixedZoneRules.java line 141:

> 139:     @Test(dataProvider="rules")
> 140:     public void test_isValidOffset_LDT_ZO(ZoneRules test, ZoneOffset 
> expectedOffset) {
> 141:         if (expectedOffset == ZoneOffset.UTC)

Extremely minor but why not wrap if with `{}` for improved readability here 
with the comment

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/12346

Reply via email to