On Wed, 14 Sep 2022 16:43:43 GMT, Lance Andersen <lan...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Please review this PR which updates the JarInputStream class description to >> clarify when the Manifest is accessible via JarInputStream::getManifest and >> JarInputStream::get[Jar]Entry. >> >> It is worth noting that with this update, we are finally documenting >> behavior that dates back to when this class was added to JDK 1.2 >> >> >> Best, >> Lance > > Lance Andersen has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional > commit since the last revision: > > Address latest input regarding wording src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/jar/JarInputStream.java line 44: > 42: * The {@link #getManifest} method will return the {@code Manifest} when > it is > 43: * the first entry in the stream, or {@code META-INF/} is the first entry > and > 44: * the {@code Manifest} is the second entry within the stream. "within the stream" should probably be "in the stream" to be consistent the first part of the sentence. src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/jar/JarInputStream.java line 51: > 49: * If {@code META-INF/} is the first entry in the input stream it will be > 50: * also not be returned by {@link #getNextEntry()} and > 51: * {@link #getNextJarEntry()}. JAR files will almost always have the manifest as the first or second entry. It's very hazardous to have getNextEntry/getNextJarEntry work differently when the manifest is present but not at the start. This makes it really hard to specify too. I wonder what the impact would be of changing the implementation so that getNextEntry/getNextJarEntry consistently skip the manifest rather than only when it's at the start. I can't think of anything right now that could dependent on the current behavior where it might or might be returned. src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/jar/JarInputStream.java line 78: > 76: * the signers. > 77: * <p> > 78: * <b>Note:</b> If a {@code JarEntry} is modified after the JAR file is > signed, Can this be an apiNote? ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/10045