I am definitely interested in your idea and will be happy to give you my impressions. I am not a mathematician but I have a chess program that is near the top.
I have always believed that despite numerous differences, in the big picture go is more like chess than we think, especially chess endings. It's always good to get some feedback first before submitting a paper for review. Don On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 6:00 AM, Leon Matoh <[email protected]>wrote: > > I tried to scratch my back yesterday > so bots can play proper endgame. > > During this time I exchanged > several emails with with certain people. > > When I started writing summary of > my findings, that single idea showed how we > can use all chess knowledge and apply > it to game of go. > > I am writing short article and > would appreciate some peer review > from expert in chess programming > or a mathematician. > > I have short summary and am writing > through emails. > > I will not discuss it in this forum as I have no time > to engage in debates. Idea is so simple that > you would't believe and I have no time to > engage in debates. > > All I ask is that you wait a little until I finish > short article (day or two) and suspend your disbelief. > > It all started with one line changed in source code of pachi > program to confirm the idea. > > > Leon Matoh > > ______________________________**_________________ > Computer-go mailing list > [email protected] > http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/**mailman/listinfo/computer-go<http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go> >
_______________________________________________ Computer-go mailing list [email protected] http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
