Hi Remi, Wow, "Weights" is your engine. So my guess was right :-) In 9x9 CGOS, did you train in 9x9, or just use 19x19 network? Weights_33_400 is stronger than Weights_40_400. Maybe it is because Weights_33_400 use CrazyStone's playout, and Weights_40_400 does not use?
Thanks, Hiroshi Yamashita On 2018/02/28 15:13, Rémi Coulom wrote:
Hi, I have just connected the newest version of Crazy Stone to CGOS. It is based on the AlphaZero approach. The "Weights" engine were in fact previous experimental versions. CrazyStone-18.03 is using time control and pondering instead of a fixed number of evaluations per move. So it should be much stronger than Weights_31_3200. Does anybody know who cronus is? It is _extremely_ strong. Its rating is low because it has had only weaker opponents, but it is undefeated so far, except for one loss on time, and some losses against other versions of itself. It has just won two games in a row against Crazy Stone. I hope the other strong engines will reconnect, too. Rémi _______________________________________________ Computer-go mailing list Computer-go@computer-go.org http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
_______________________________________________ Computer-go mailing list Computer-go@computer-go.org http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
