If you are killed by an AI-driven car, the manufacturer will use the case to improve the algorithm and make sure that this type of death never happens again. Unfortunately a death by a drunk driver doesn't seem to teach anyone anything and will keep happening as long as people need to drive and alcoholism exists.
On Sat, Jan 7, 2017 at 10:35 PM, Gonçalo Mendes Ferreira <go...@sapo.pt> wrote: > Well, I don't know what is the likelihood of being hit by drunk drivers > or AI driven cars, but if it were the same I'd prefer to have drunk > drivers. Drunk drivers you can understand: you can improve your chances > by making yourself more visible, do not jump from beyond obstacles, be > more careful when crossing or not crossing before they actually stop. A > failure in an AI car seems much more unpredictable. > > Gonçalo > > On 07/01/2017 21:24, Xavier Combelle wrote: > > > >> ...this is a major objective. E.g., we do not want AI driven cars > >> working right most of the time but sometimes killing people because > >> the AI faces situations (such as a local sand storm or a painting on > >> the street with a fake landscape or fake human being) outside its > >> current training and reading. > > currently I don't like to be killed by a drunk driver, and to my opinion > > it is very more likely to happen than an AI killing me because a mistake > > in programming (I know, it is not the point of view of most of people > > which want a perfect AI with zero dead and not an AI which would reduce > > the death on road by a factor 100) > > _______________________________________________ > > Computer-go mailing list > > Computer-go@computer-go.org > > http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go > > > _______________________________________________ > Computer-go mailing list > Computer-go@computer-go.org > http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go >
_______________________________________________ Computer-go mailing list Computer-go@computer-go.org http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
