Well, I don't know what is the likelihood of being hit by drunk drivers or AI driven cars, but if it were the same I'd prefer to have drunk drivers. Drunk drivers you can understand: you can improve your chances by making yourself more visible, do not jump from beyond obstacles, be more careful when crossing or not crossing before they actually stop. A failure in an AI car seems much more unpredictable.
Gonçalo On 07/01/2017 21:24, Xavier Combelle wrote: > >> ...this is a major objective. E.g., we do not want AI driven cars >> working right most of the time but sometimes killing people because >> the AI faces situations (such as a local sand storm or a painting on >> the street with a fake landscape or fake human being) outside its >> current training and reading. > currently I don't like to be killed by a drunk driver, and to my opinion > it is very more likely to happen than an AI killing me because a mistake > in programming (I know, it is not the point of view of most of people > which want a perfect AI with zero dead and not an AI which would reduce > the death on road by a factor 100) > _______________________________________________ > Computer-go mailing list > Computer-go@computer-go.org > http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go > _______________________________________________ Computer-go mailing list Computer-go@computer-go.org http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
