Tobias and all,

Tobias Graf: <56164f25.8010...@gmx.de>:
>Hi,
>just my 2 cents:
>
>1. "Reducing computing power." Just let me quote the standings of the 
>last 9x9 tournament.
>1) 18 Cores
>2) 80 Cores
>3) 12 Cores
>4) 288 Cores
>5) 8 Cores
>
>Moreover, using the 18 cores of place number one is affordable to 
>everyone as Remi outlined.

Looking at the before last 9x9 tournament 
(http://www.weddslist.com/kgs/past/113/index.html):
1) 20 cores x 3 GHz (Zen)
2) 18 cores x 2.9 GHz (CrazyStone)
3) 12 cores x 2.8 GHz (DolBaram)
4) 6 cores x 3.3 GHz (Aya)
5) 80 cores x 2.6GHz (Abakus).
#Zen, DolBaram and Aya were (practically) absent at the last 9x9.
##Above clock frequency numbers are rated ones and actual values can 
vary due to Intel Turbo Boost Tech.  My Xeon box usually runs at 3.3 to 
3.5 GHz.

Even 6-cores can beat 80-cores.  This is not surprising on small boards.  
Please evaluate the boost of your network parallelization on 9x9.  It's 
(maybe) very small (or sometimes negative; depends on the method, number 
of node computers, etc).  Cluster parallelization is, however, very 
important to push-up last one or two ranks on larger boards.

>Still, i would compete in a few desktop-hardware-tournaments. It should 
>just have reasonable limits, there is no point to make a tournament on 
>raspberry pi's ;-) Maybe one of the slow-tournaments can be changed into 
>a desktop-hardware tournament.
>
>2) stefan kaitschick proposed to "force a minimum time consumption on 
>the first moves of 9*9 games. It's annoying as a spectator to have the 
>first 8 moves or so just spit out on the board, forcing you to go back 
>to see what happened there."
>I don't like forcing too many things. But it is a very good idea, so i 
>just added a one second book-delay to abakus. Maybe other authors find 
>this useful, too.

Yes, it also helps human players prevent making a bad move on the spur 
of the moment.

Hideki

>On 10/07/2015 12:27 PM, Nick Wedd wrote:
>> I am thinking of making some small changes to the way I run bot 
>> tournaments on KGS.  If you have ever taken part in a KGS bot 
>> tournament, I would like to hear your opinions on three things.
>>
>>
>> 1.  Limit on processor power?
>>
>> This is the main point on which I want your opinions.  The other two 
>> are trivial.
>>
>> Several people have suggested to me that these events would be fairer 
>> if there were a limit on the computing power of the entrants. I would 
>> like to do this, but I don't know how. I have little understanding of 
>> the terminology, I don't know how /e.g./ multiple cores in one 
>> computer compare with multiple computers on one network, and I don't 
>> know how to count a graphics card. /If/ someone can find a way to 
>> specify an upper limit to permitted power which is clear and easy to 
>> understand, and /if/ most entrants would favor imposing such a limit, 
>> I will discuss what it should be, and apply it.  I am not able to 
>> check what entrants are really running on, but I will trust people.
>>
>>
>> 2. Zeroes in the "Annual Championship" table.
>>
>> The table at http://www.weddslist.com/kgs/annual/index.html has a 0 in 
>> a cell where a program competed but did not score, and a blank where 
>> it did not compete (at least it should do, I sometimes get it wrong). 
>> I would prefer to omit these zeroes, they seem a bit rude. Also there 
>> is no clear distinction between competing and not competing - how 
>> should I treat a program which crashes and disappears after two 
>> rounds, or one (like AyaMC last Sunday) which plays in every round but 
>> is broken and has no chance of winning?  I realise that the zeroes 
>> some convey information that may be of interest. Should I continue to 
>> use them, or just leave those cells blank?
>>
>>
>> 3. Live crosstable
>>
>> When I write up my reports, I include a crosstable, like the one near 
>> the top of http://www.weddslist.com/kgs/past/116/index.html .  This is 
>> easy for me, I run a script which reads the data from the KGS page 
>> (http://www.gokgs.com/tournEntrants.jsp?sort=s&id=990 in this case) 
>> and builds the crosstable in html, which I copy into the tournament 
>> report. It only works for Swiss (and maybe Round Robin) tournaments. 
>> It works while the tournament is still running, though only between 
>> rounds.I could build a current crosstable each round during a 
>> tournament if there is any demand for it.
>>
>> -- 
>> Nick Wedd mapr...@gmail.com <mailto:mapr...@gmail.com>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Computer-go mailing list
>> Computer-go@computer-go.org
>> http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
>---- inline file
>_______________________________________________
>Computer-go mailing list
>Computer-go@computer-go.org
>http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
-- 
Hideki Kato <mailto:hideki_ka...@ybb.ne.jp>
_______________________________________________
Computer-go mailing list
Computer-go@computer-go.org
http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go

Reply via email to