Hi Nick, I don’t care much about having a limit on processing power. I’d be happy either way.
Cloud computing platforms like Amazon EC2 allows to rent powerful servers at a low price. The machine I used for the tournament cost me 0.3$/hour or so. So the argument that only rich or academic people can get powerful hardware is not good. A cluster of 8 such machines would still be quite cheap. And making an efficient distributed search algorithm is an interesting and challenging technical problem. So I feel it is interesting to allow big clusters. Thanks for organizing the KGS tournaments, by the way. Rémi On 7 oct. 2015, at 12:27, Nick Wedd <mapr...@gmail.com> wrote: > I am thinking of making some small changes to the way I run bot tournaments > on KGS. If you have ever taken part in a KGS bot tournament, I would like to > hear your opinions on three things. > > > 1. Limit on processor power? > > This is the main point on which I want your opinions. The other two are > trivial. > > Several people have suggested to me that these events would be fairer if > there were a limit on the computing power of the entrants. I would like to do > this, but I don't know how. I have little understanding of the terminology, I > don't know how e.g. multiple cores in one computer compare with multiple > computers on one network, and I don't know how to count a graphics card. If > someone can find a way to specify an upper limit to permitted power which is > clear and easy to understand, and if most entrants would favor imposing such > a limit, I will discuss what it should be, and apply it. I am not able to > check what entrants are really running on, but I will trust people. > > > 2. Zeroes in the "Annual Championship" table. > > The table at http://www.weddslist.com/kgs/annual/index.html has a 0 in a cell > where a program competed but did not score, and a blank where it did not > compete (at least it should do, I sometimes get it wrong). I would prefer to > omit these zeroes, they seem a bit rude. Also there is no clear distinction > between competing and not competing - how should I treat a program which > crashes and disappears after two rounds, or one (like AyaMC last Sunday) > which plays in every round but is broken and has no chance of winning? I > realise that the zeroes some convey information that may be of interest. > Should I continue to use them, or just leave those cells blank? > > > 3. Live crosstable > > When I write up my reports, I include a crosstable, like the one near the top > of http://www.weddslist.com/kgs/past/116/index.html . This is easy for me, I > run a script which reads the data from the KGS page > (http://www.gokgs.com/tournEntrants.jsp?sort=s&id=990 in this case) and > builds the crosstable in html, which I copy into the tournament report. It > only works for Swiss (and maybe Round Robin) tournaments. It works while the > tournament is still running, though only between rounds.I could build a > current crosstable each round during a tournament if there is any demand for > it. > > -- > Nick Wedd mapr...@gmail.com > _______________________________________________ > Computer-go mailing list > Computer-go@computer-go.org > http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
_______________________________________________ Computer-go mailing list Computer-go@computer-go.org http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
