Don Dailey wrote: > Ingo Althofer: >> I had eight handplayed (4 + 4) games on 19x19 with very >> high handicap, where the version with dynamic komi (rule 42) >> gained a 3-1 score and the version with static komi >> performed 0-4 versus the same opponent. This is evidence >> in the 95% region that the version with dynamic komi is >> not weaker than the static version. > > Were these games against humans or other computer players?
Good questions, but only this first one applies. The strong program was Many Faces of Go with (modified) MCTS (from the official version MFoG 12.013). The weak opponent was Many Faces of Go on a weaker level (if I remember correctly it was level 12k or so). These weaker versions are (still) included in MFoG 12. I ran the two programs on different PCs of comparable strength. Ingo. > If the games were against a human player, were they blind? Did > the player know he was participating in an experiment? Did he > know what results you hoped to see? And were the games alternated > so that the result was not skewed too much by his experience with the > program? -- NEU: Mit GMX DSL über 1000,- ¿ sparen! http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/dsl02 _______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
