And for MCTS it is much lower than 10.

2009/5/12 terry mcintyre <terrymcint...@yahoo.com>

> In the opening, among reasonably clueful players, the branching factor is
> much closer to 10 than to 361.
>
> Terry McIntyre <terrymcint...@yahoo.com>
>
> On general principles, when we are looking for a solution of a social
> problem, we must expect to reach conclusions quite opposed to the usual
> opinions on the subject; otherwise it would be no problem. We must expect to
> have to attack, not what is commonly regarded as objectionable, but what is
> commonly regarded as entirely proper and normal.
>
>
> – John Beverley Robinson, 1897
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Michael Williams <michaelwilliam...@gmail.com>
> **
> *Subject:* Re: [computer-go] Re: Implications of a CPU vs Memory trend on
> MCTS
>
> You have made the assumption that the move that your opponent selected was
> on average explored equally as much as all of the other moves.  That seems a
> bit pessimistic.  One would expect that the opponent selected a strong move
> and one would also expect that your tree explored that strong move more than
> it did other moves.  I'm not saying keeping the tree is a huge benefit.  I'm
> just saying that I don't think your 99% number is fair.
>
>
>
> Dave Dyer wrote:
> > At 02:13 PM 5/12/2009, Michael Williams wrote:
> >> Where does your 99% figure come from?
> >
> > 1/361 < 1%
> >
> > by endgame there are still easily 100 empty spaces
> > on the board.
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > computer-go mailing list
> > computer-go@computer-go.org
> > http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> computer-go mailing list
> computer-go@computer-go.org
> http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> computer-go mailing list
> computer-go@computer-go.org
> http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
>
_______________________________________________
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/

Reply via email to