On Tue, 2008-12-30 at 13:13 -0800, Christoph Birk wrote: > On Tue, 30 Dec 2008, Don Dailey wrote: > > Distance 3 could easily play worse - we shall see. Just because a > > distance 3 move is sometimes good doesn't mean it will make the program > > play better not throwing those out. If it's RARELY best, then the > > reduced effort and increased focus on (usually) more relevant moves > > could be a win. In fact I expect distance 2 to be better for that > > reason. > > IMHO 'd3' could be worse than 'd2' but not worse than 'base'.
Agreed. d3 should definitely be safer and has less potential to hurt things. So although I believe d2 will come out better than d3, it's like a risky investment with a higher expected value, such an investment has more risk too. - Don > > Christoph > _______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
