On Tue, 30 Dec 2008, Don Dailey wrote:
Distance 3 could easily play worse - we shall see. Just because a distance 3 move is sometimes good doesn't mean it will make the program play better not throwing those out. If it's RARELY best, then the reduced effort and increased focus on (usually) more relevant moves could be a win. In fact I expect distance 2 to be better for that reason.
IMHO 'd3' could be worse than 'd2' but not worse than 'base'. Christoph _______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/