On Tue, 30 Dec 2008, Don Dailey wrote:
Distance 3 could easily play worse - we shall see.   Just because a
distance 3 move is sometimes good doesn't mean it will make the program
play better not throwing those out.   If it's RARELY best, then the
reduced effort and increased focus on (usually) more relevant moves
could be a win.   In fact I expect distance 2 to be better for that
reason.

IMHO 'd3' could be worse than 'd2' but not worse than 'base'.

Christoph

_______________________________________________
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/

Reply via email to