On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 11:45 +0200, Vlad Dumitrescu wrote: > On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 00:11, Don Dailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I would be willing for people to hosts these tests on a variety of > > systems. > > Sorry, I misunderstood your original announcement. > > I suppose you're going to describe the whole setup once you get to > that part, so I will wait.
Yes, the whole idea is to build your own bot and if you wish, try to make it run as fast as possible. I will test it for conformance in black box style so you can cheat if you can fool my tests. Hopefully it will be difficult not to follow the standard and still pass the stringent tests. If you pass the test, then they are compared for speed in a competitive fashion. That's why I don't specify the random number generator or specifically how moves are to be uniformly randomly selected. If you specify that moves are selected randomly, how can you then give a specific algorithm for exactly how to do this? It ceases to become random. Of course it's understood that they won't be truly random but like real pseudo random number generators all you have to do is fool the best known tests. - Don > > best regards, > Vlad > _______________________________________________ > computer-go mailing list > computer-go@computer-go.org > http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
