Claus Reinke wrote: > Second, having now looked at some more random "light playouts" > (just instrument your engine to output sgf before starting the next run), > I feel that the name is highly misleading. These simulation runs have > very little in common with actual play, eg, in a 19x19 run from an > empty board, one might see an opening period, with 200 moves of > randomly placed stones, followed by a middle period, with 100 or > so moves occasionally making a firm connection or a true single-space > eye, followed by an endgame with 100-200 moves exploring possible > consequences of those little bits of random mess that cannot be ruined > by random play.
Just out of curiosity, what did you expect from the playouts? /Gunnar _______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
