David Schneider-Joseph wrote: > On that topic - might it be possible that the notion of a "proper > komi", derived as it is from "the hand of God" (perfect play), will > invariably be too high for any actual go players which would be an > interesting match for each other? I guess it's possible. I don't think it's likely but I guess nobody can say with 100% certainty what the correct komi really is at any non-trivial board size.
- Don > > On Feb 11, 2008, at 7:35 PM, Andy wrote: > >> But the program isn't stronger than pros, so how can it give better >> information about proper komi? >> >> On Feb 11, 2008 6:09 PM, Christoph Birk <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: >> >> On Mon, 11 Feb 2008, Don Dailey wrote: >> > I don't bet, but if I did, I would bet that it's 7 or 8, and I'm >> > fairly certain that with best play the game would end with 7 extra >> > points for black. >> > >> > I think this was discussed at great length 2 or 3 years ago. >> >> I know ... I brought it up again because of Mogo's success. >> A very (!) strong program should be able to tell us the proper >> komi. >> >> Christoph >> >> _______________________________________________ >> computer-go mailing list >> computer-go@computer-go.org <mailto:computer-go@computer-go.org> >> http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/ >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> computer-go mailing list >> computer-go@computer-go.org <mailto:computer-go@computer-go.org> >> http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > computer-go mailing list > computer-go@computer-go.org > http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/ _______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
