I don't think my prepared files will run on 64 bit linux but you can try. - Don
Hideki Kato wrote: > Yes, Fedora Core 5-64bit for AMD and Ubuntu 7.10-64bit for Intel. > > Which is better do you think, however, to stop current running bots on > cgos and run your clients instead OR to keep current bots runnig? > As Terry already answered to you. > > -Hideki > > Don Dailey: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> Do you run linux? >> >> I already have a tarball which has almost everything you need - and it >> includes the binaries and has each player set up in the registry. >> >> The only thing missing is an automated scheme to get the result files to >> me. I'm looking to see if I can get an ftp server working. >> >> It will be flexible enough that you can run multiple instances if you >> want - and stop them when you want and restart without hassle. >> However, if one of the long players is playing, you might lose >> several hours if you kill it! >> >> Of course you can use "nice" to run these at low priority. >> >> Are you willing? I can send you a test package now which will >> determine if it will run without hassle. >> >> - Don >> >> >> >> >> Hideki Kato wrote: >> >>> Hi Don, >>> >>> I'm now running mogo-pr-1cpu on my quad core box, Intel Q6600 3GHz >>> with 4GB RAM and gnugo-3.7.11-l10F, gnugo-3.7.10-l10F and FatMan-1 >>> on an AMD athlon64 2GHz with 1GB RAM, as reference programs on cgos >>> 9x9. I can provide these two boxes for your experiment. Then, how >>> long will it take? >>> >>> Hideki >>> >>> Don Dailey: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>> >>> >>>> Michael Williams wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> It is a very nice graph. I wish we could see the next 11 doublings. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> With some help, I could redo this experiment and add: >>>> >>>> 1 or 2 more levels. >>>> A version of gnugo with known strength. >>>> and/or some fixed version of mogo - which we could simultaneously >>>> test on CGOS. >>>> >>>> I would need an enormous amount of power to complete this with a good >>>> sample in less than a few months. >>>> >>>> Anybody have any linux machines lying around? They need to be >>>> relatively powerful and probably need at least 1 gig of memory due to >>>> the large tree size I would have to set up. >>>> >>>> - Don >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> computer-go mailing list >>>> computer-go@computer-go.org >>>> http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/ >>>> >>>> >>> -- >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kato) >>> _______________________________________________ >>> computer-go mailing list >>> computer-go@computer-go.org >>> http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/ >>> >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> computer-go mailing list >> computer-go@computer-go.org >> http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/ >> > -- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kato) > _______________________________________________ > computer-go mailing list > computer-go@computer-go.org > http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/ > > _______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
