David Fotland wrote: > Isn't Greenpeep an alpha-beta searcher, not UCT/MC? > > Since Go ranks are based an handicap stones, and 100 ELO points implies a > particular winning percentage, it would be an unlikely coincidence if 1 rank > is 100 ELO points. Any web site that claims this must be wrong :) and > should have little credibility. > I don't believe it's 100 ELO either. It's probably something between 100 and 200.
> David > > > >> The strongest bot on CGOS all time list seems to be greenpeep0.5.1 >> <http://cgos.boardspace.net/9x9/cross/greenpeep0.5.1.html> with a >> rating >> of 2621. >> >> This implies it is almost equal to a 5 Dan player - which doesn't sound >> right to me. However, this could be fluky since it is as at the >> extreme end of the scale. It would be great if this same program >> could play some strong humans at the equivalent time control on KGS at >> 9x9 and we could adjust the difference between ranks accordingly. >> >> I suspect there is more than 100 ELO between ranks at 9x9. >> >> - Don >> >> >> >> Don Dailey wrote: >> >>> Christoph, >>> >>> Your bayeselo rating is 1942 on CGOS. I compiled a table that >>> >> has >> >>> all players with 50 games or more which can be found here: >>> >>> http://cgos.boardspace.net/9x9/hof2.html >>> >>> >>> - Don >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Christoph Birk wrote: >>> >>> >>>> On Tue, 11 Dec 2007, Don Dailey wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> Christoph, >>>>> Let me know when you are finished, what name you are playing under >>>>> >> and >> >>>>> I will do the bayeselo thing to get a better figure. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> I am playing using the 'tast-3k' account. Right, now I have 71 games >>>> and a rating of 1979 ELO. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> Also, I can >>>>> throw out any games that were irregular if you can identify them, >>>>> >> such >> >>>>> as if a match started when you were not looking or your interface >>>>> >> got >> >>>>> glitchy or something. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Since I added the GUI I lost no games due to software problems. >>>> Only a few "won" games lost to human stupidity :-) >>>> >>>> I will take a break over the holidays, maybe playing a few more >>>> games in the new year, but I guess for my purposes a zero-point >>>> "3k-AGA ~=~ 2000 CGOS-ELO" >>>> is close enough. Unless we get some other (AGA or KGS) rated >>>> players it not make sense to get a more precise rating for the >>>> scale. >>>> >>>> Christoph >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> computer-go mailing list >>>> computer-go@computer-go.org >>>> http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> computer-go mailing list >> computer-go@computer-go.org >> http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/ >> > > _______________________________________________ > computer-go mailing list > computer-go@computer-go.org > http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/ > > _______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
