Isn't Greenpeep an alpha-beta searcher, not UCT/MC? Since Go ranks are based an handicap stones, and 100 ELO points implies a particular winning percentage, it would be an unlikely coincidence if 1 rank is 100 ELO points. Any web site that claims this must be wrong :) and should have little credibility.
David > > The strongest bot on CGOS all time list seems to be greenpeep0.5.1 > <http://cgos.boardspace.net/9x9/cross/greenpeep0.5.1.html> with a > rating > of 2621. > > This implies it is almost equal to a 5 Dan player - which doesn't sound > right to me. However, this could be fluky since it is as at the > extreme end of the scale. It would be great if this same program > could play some strong humans at the equivalent time control on KGS at > 9x9 and we could adjust the difference between ranks accordingly. > > I suspect there is more than 100 ELO between ranks at 9x9. > > - Don > > > > Don Dailey wrote: > > Christoph, > > > > Your bayeselo rating is 1942 on CGOS. I compiled a table that > has > > all players with 50 games or more which can be found here: > > > > http://cgos.boardspace.net/9x9/hof2.html > > > > > > - Don > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Christoph Birk wrote: > > > >> On Tue, 11 Dec 2007, Don Dailey wrote: > >> > >>> Christoph, > >>> Let me know when you are finished, what name you are playing under > and > >>> I will do the bayeselo thing to get a better figure. > >>> > >> I am playing using the 'tast-3k' account. Right, now I have 71 games > >> and a rating of 1979 ELO. > >> > >> > >>> Also, I can > >>> throw out any games that were irregular if you can identify them, > such > >>> as if a match started when you were not looking or your interface > got > >>> glitchy or something. > >>> > >> Since I added the GUI I lost no games due to software problems. > >> Only a few "won" games lost to human stupidity :-) > >> > >> I will take a break over the holidays, maybe playing a few more > >> games in the new year, but I guess for my purposes a zero-point > >> "3k-AGA ~=~ 2000 CGOS-ELO" > >> is close enough. Unless we get some other (AGA or KGS) rated > >> players it not make sense to get a more precise rating for the > >> scale. > >> > >> Christoph > >> _______________________________________________ > >> computer-go mailing list > >> computer-go@computer-go.org > >> http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/ > >> > >> > > > > > _______________________________________________ > computer-go mailing list > computer-go@computer-go.org > http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/ _______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
