Le jeudi 11 octobre 2007 21:15, Don Dailey a écrit : > I appreciate the vote of confidence, but my point is that if you want > some kind of "certified" rating CGOS is not a good choice. You can run > anything on CGOS and claim anything. You could even substitute a > strong human player, if you wanted to. > > So even though it's "open" in one big sense it's really closed in > another sense. It's almost like internet identities, you can hide and > mis-represent yourself easily. > > - Don >
I think CGOS 19x19 was lacking handicap stones. It is totally useless to play even games with much stronger opponent, but it is interesting to play with correct handicap. So far it seems every body was fair, and did not cheat on the hardware they were using (this could also lead to problems for publications later). So just keeping this good spirit, and trust people is an additional nice feature of Cgos. my 2 cents. Alain _______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
