>> >Using prior knowledge on "normal" uct, and this was the use of prior >> >knowledge brought about the same improvement. >> >> You mean, there is more improvement when using both? > >I mean that there is no need to have AMAF to get improvement by using prior >knowledge.
Sorry, what is AMAF? And I have another question; Don't you use Q_RLGO anymore? If so, would you explain the detail of the Q_MoGo heuristic? -- Yamato _______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
