>The cumulative result is only given using the prior knowledge on top >of RAVE, but it could have been done the other way round and give the >same type of results. Each particular improvement is somehow >independent of the others.
I think I don't understand that. What do you mean for "the other way round?" >All experiments (except the default policy) were played against GnuGo >level 10, not level 8. That's surprising news to me... -- Yamato _______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
