Hello, 2007/6/23, Yamato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>The cumulative result is only given using the prior knowledge on top >of RAVE, but it could have been done the other way round and give the >same type of results. Each particular improvement is somehow >independent of the others. I think I don't understand that. What do you mean for "the other way round?"
Using prior knowledge on "normal" uct, and this was the use of prior knowledge brought about the same improvement.
All experiments (except the default policy) were played against GnuGo >level 10, not level 8. That's surprising news to me...
It was gnugo default level, and we thought "default" was 8, but default is actually 10. I don't see why it is so surprising, I guess it does not change really the level of gnugo. Sylvain
_______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
