If the simulated games are about 5x longer, and the board is over 4x bigger, then we would need over 20x the time to get the same number of simulations per position evaluated by UCT. I suspect the larger board will need may more simulations to get a reliable score.
How about 20 minutes per side? There will still be a reliable rating in a day or so. David > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Edward de Grijs > Sent: Monday, December 11, 2006 11:50 PM > To: computer-go@computer-go.org > Subject: RE: [computer-go] 19x19 CGOS? > > > > > > >From: "David Fotland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >I'd like to see 30 minutes per side, since > >that's pretty typical for human games. > > I'd like to see 10 minutes per side, obtaining an accurate > rating more quickly, although I realize that shorter times > are less suited for MC based programs. > > Is it an option to introduce handicap stones to get a > rating just like humans? > > Edward > > _________________________________________________________________ > Windows Live Mail: Kies je eigen kleur, indeling en contacten! > http://imagine-windowslive.com/mail/launch/default.aspx?Locale=nl-nl > > _______________________________________________ > computer-go mailing list > computer-go@computer-go.org > http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/ > _______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
