Agner Fog, in his well known optimization guide, claims that Digital
Mars compilers are rather weak optimizers. But the features of D
language are indeed admirable.
I would be grateful to see direct performance comparison on MC Go program
(or on anything else)
http://www.agner.org/
BTW
Does anybody know what is the performance of the native compiled C# ?
Best Regards,
Lukasz
On 12/4/06, Don Dailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Since we have been talking about programming language recently, I was
curious as to whether anyone on this group has experimented with the
digital mars D programming language?
>From the hype on the web page, it looks an extremely capable programming
language that is supposed to be fast native code compiled like C, but
have all the features you might ask for in a higher level language.
It may be complete garbage for all I know, but at least from the
description it seems like something I would be happy to use. It looks
like a cleaned up version of C, with a bunch of higher level language
features built right in such as associative arrays, garbage collection,
dynamic arrays, oop, etc. It compiles to native code, has a GCC
compiler as well as a digital mars compiler.
Since my go program is tiny, I may give it a try and do a speed
comparison. But I was wondering if anyone else has had any experience
with it, good or bad.
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/index.html
- Don
_______________________________________________
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
_______________________________________________
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
