DanielLeens commented on PR #13081: URL: https://github.com/apache/seatunnel/pull/13081#issuecomment-6673279894
Thanks for the update, @sharpca. The CI fact cited in my previous reply has changed: [attempt 2 of run 41881173697](https://github.com/sharpca/seatunnel/actions/runs/41881173697/attempts/2) completed successfully on the unchanged head `cac71da1e29ecfbbf7890286dbecbd791b732bf3`. My existing technical approval stands; no source change is requested. The Apache [Build check](https://github.com/apache/seatunnel/runs/126428630380) still points to the older failed run 41785719208 in the current snapshot. I should correct my earlier suggestion that it would necessarily switch on its own: the remaining step is for a maintainer to reconcile/retrigger the PR-signal/check-adoption workflow against the successful exact-head run, then confirm branch protection. Please keep the green run link rather than changing unrelated TiDB code or syncing merely to replace that stale check. This is a CI-gate clarification, not another source review. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
