jlaitine commented on code in PR #16673:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16673#discussion_r2197907864
##########
sched/sched/sched_setpriority.c:
##########
@@ -223,29 +230,30 @@ static inline void nxsched_running_setpriority(FAR struct
tcb_s *tcb,
/* A context switch will occur. */
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
- if (tcb->cpu != this_cpu() &&
+ int cpu = this_cpu();
+ if (tcb->cpu != cpu &&
tcb->task_state == TSTATE_TASK_RUNNING)
{
- struct reprioritize_arg_s arg;
+ struct reprioritize_arg_s *arg = &g_reprioritize_arg[cpu];
Review Comment:
That was a good finding, thanks! I am not quite sure what would be the
cleanest way to fix it. It can't re-enter semaphore code, so it can't be
synchronous.
Maybe place the arguments directly into tcb then like this?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@nuttx.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
