raiden00pl commented on issue #15319: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/15319#issuecomment-2867114388
> We disagreed on that (and that's fine, we agreed that we can disagree! ;) ). However, that upper-half driver was accepted at the time it was provided. Then, you can't dictate that some individual (or company) should deal with it because you don't like it. This would even be true even if the whole community now has a different understanding and considers it an OS architecture problem: no one can dictate that someone is responsible for it because it didn't break any existing build or usage. This is an open-source project and we (talking as a PMC member) need to understand that contributors have a different set of priorities. Nope. This is against INVIOLABLES.md which I explained quite thoroughly in the earlier discussion about this topic. The INVIOLABLES.md is the most important "contract" in this project which every participant should adhere to, especially PMC. But this is not the subject of this issue so I'm done here. If you want to continue, please go to https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/15431 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@nuttx.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
