nuttxpr commented on PR #15996:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15996#issuecomment-2727013066

   [**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback 
here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues)
   
   
   
   Yes, this PR appears to meet the NuttX requirements.
   
   Here's a breakdown based on the requirements document:
   
   * **Summary:**  Clear explanation of the change, its purpose (new platform 
support), how it works (porting from qemu-armv8a, with modifications 
documented), and links to no related issues (which is fine).  The summary is 
concise and informative.
   * **Impact:**  Well-addressed.  Clearly states no impact on existing code, 
which is important for minimizing regressions.  Acknowledges the new platform 
support as the primary impact.  No mention of documentation updates being 
included in the PR itself, which is good practice.
   * **Testing:** Excellent. Provides multiple forms of verification:
       * Build host information is missing. While the target is well-described, 
knowing the host OS and compiler used is helpful for reproducibility.
       * Target details are complete, specifying architecture, board, and 
configuration.
       * "Before" logs are not strictly necessary in this case since it's new 
platform support (there wouldn't be any prior behavior).
       * "After" logs comprehensively demonstrate the successful boot, basic 
shell functionality, and the passing of `ostest`, which is crucial for 
validating core OS functionality.  Including the demo video is a nice touch.
   
   **Recommendations for Improvement:**
   
   1. **Build Host Details:** Add the build host information to the testing 
section (OS, CPU architecture, compiler version).
   2. **Explicit Documentation Mention (Optional):** Even though the 
documentation impact is implied, explicitly stating "Documentation updated in 
platforms/arm64/a527/index.rst" would remove any ambiguity.
   
   Overall, the PR demonstrates a good understanding of the NuttX requirements 
and provides sufficient information for review.  The addition of the missing 
build host details would make it even stronger.
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@nuttx.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to