nuttxpr commented on PR #15862: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15862#issuecomment-2667321613
[**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues) No, this PR does not fully meet the NuttX requirements. While it provides a summary of the changes, it lacks crucial details. Here's a breakdown of the missing information: * **Insufficient Summary:** While the summary mentions renaming functions, it doesn't explain *why* this change is necessary. What problem does it solve? What are the benefits? The linked PR provides more context, but this PR should be understandable on its own. What does "_notrace" signify? * **Missing Functional Description:** The summary vaguely mentions "improvements," but doesn't detail *what* functional part of the code is affected. Be more specific. Is this related to scheduling? Synchronization primitives? Kernel internals? * **How it Works:** The summary lacks a clear explanation of *how* the change works. Just stating "rename" doesn't convey the technical implications. Does this affect the behavior of spinlocks? Are there performance implications? * **Impact Section is Inadequate:** "N/A" is unacceptable. Even seemingly minor changes can have impacts. Consider: * **Impact on Build:** Does this renaming require any changes to build scripts or Kconfig options? * **Impact on Compatibility:** Does this change break any existing code that uses the old function names? If not, explicitly state that. * **Impact on Documentation:** Does this change necessitate updates to the documentation? * **Testing is Insufficient:** "ci-check" is not enough detail. What specific tests were run? What platforms? Provide actual log snippets showing the behavior before and after the change. Ideally, demonstrate the problem the change solves with the "before" logs. **In short:** This PR needs significant improvement in terms of clarity, detail, and justification for the changes. It needs to stand alone and provide all the necessary context for a reviewer to understand and evaluate the changes effectively. Simply linking to another PR shifts the burden of understanding to the reviewer and makes it much harder to assess the validity and impact of this specific PR. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@nuttx.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
